Hello Friends and fellow marketers,
Today I want to share with you a comparison between two companies. TWRPS and GDI. But you can use this data when checking about any other company. You will see that Teamwork Revolution Power System comes out best.
James Al-Oboudi wrote:
Break Even Point.
It takes 10 people to recoup your membership fee with GDI.
It takes 2 people to recoup your membership fee with TWRPS.
Payout Percentage.
GDI pays out 50% of all payments as commissions to its members.
TWRPS pays out 96.8% of all payments as commissions to its members.
Spillover.
There is absolutely no spillover at all with GDI.
TWRPS offers a mathematically unbeatable spillover rate.
Average Earnings Per Person.
You earn an average of $1 per person in your downline with GDI.
From a full TWRPS matrix, you earn an average of $4.56 per person in your downline.
Total Earnings.
With 510 people in your GDI downline, you earn $510.
With 510 people in your TWRPS downline, you earn $2,330.
Products and Services.
As for the products and services, you can clearly see the difference for yourself. I think it's safe to say that TWRPS offers much more than GDI in terms of products and services.
Bonuses.
One popular aspect of GDI (I should know, as I was once ranked as high as second in the world on their leaderboard) is their bonus program. However, in my opinion, bonus programs are a marketing ploy used by companies to try to con people into joining their business, as virtually no one can ever actually meet the criteria for earning a bonus. It is only very talented marketers that can ever earn a bonus, and unfortunately, that excludes about 99.9% of all affiliate and network marketers. If you're offering a great bonus that virtually no one can achieve, it doesn't do anyone much good. All it does is help the company (and I am by no means speaking of only GDI, as there are MANY companies that do this) to make tons of money by recruiting people with the illusion that they are going to make a fortune from bonuses. However, the company knows, just as other very well experienced marketers in this industry know, that only about 1% of their member base at the most is ever going to earn a bonus.
This is kind of like gambling. The company tries to estimate how much money they can make from announcing that they offer a tremendous bonus program in comparison to how much money they will actually have to pay people who earn bonuses. If they calculate that the amount of money they can bring in due to selling people the illusion that they are actually going to earn bonuses is higher than the amount of money they will actually have to pay out in bonuses, they go with the bonus program.
As for me, I know very well that 99.9% of people are never going to earn a bonus, especially not when it requires you to recruit 5 people a week as GDI does, or even 5 people in a month as another competing company offers, as the statistics prove that the average affiliate marketer recruits 2.8 people per month. You must also remember that that average number includes the figures generated by the superstar, heavy hitter marketers, so the truth is that the average person who joins a company like GDI, TWRPS, or any other similar program, only recruits about 0-2 people a month (which is why a mathematically unbeatable spillover rate is crucial to success, as teamwork is vital to building a large downline). Therefore, bonus programs are almost completely worthless. The only people they benefit are the owners of the company and superstar, heavy hitter marketers.
Personally, I'd rather pay people as much as possible (96.8%) for who are actually in their downline rather than keeping more money for myself and selling everyone an illusion of all the money they can possibly make in bonuses that they will never actually achieve. It's like offering someone a $100,000,000 bonus for every 10,000 paid members recruited in a 24 hour period. It sounds great, and it would certainly help the company to make a lot of money, but the fact is that no one would ever meet that quota, so the bonus would never have to be paid. In my opinion, companies that have lower payout percentages and then offer bonus programs instead are depending on the fact that the overwhelming vast majority of people don't know everything I just said and are completely oblivious to the truth that they will more than likely never be able to meet the quota for the bonus. This is why I am insistent on simply paying out as much as possible for the people who are actually already in your downline rather than selling people dreams of money they can never earn and using that dream to con as many people as possible into joining my company.
Furthermore, bonuses create competition between members of the same team. Think about it. Why would your sponsor and upline teach you everything they know about marketing if most of their money is coming from bonuses? If they teach you everything they know, then you now become a threat to their ability to earn a bonus. It is much better to simply abandon bonus programs that virtually no one can ever achieve, and in turn simply pay out as much as possible while creating an environment where everyone thrives by exchanging as much knowledge as possible. That's what TWRPS is.
I hope this answers your question.
Thanks,
James :D
I invite you to check it our for yourself.
Sandi Gobely
Teamwork Revolution Power System
Posts
